Proposal record · exact version 1
Should major Council decisions receive a plain-language public advisory vote?
A prototype proposal to pair selected Council agenda items with sourced summaries, trade-offs, advisory voting and a later comparison to the official Council record.
Print-ready page. Use your browser’s Print command to print or save as PDF. Return to the interactive exact-version page.
- Exact proposal version
- 1 (proposal-version:public-council-vote-overlay:1)
- Jurisdiction
- City of Vancouver
- Origin
- Demonstration
- Status
- Open For Participation
Requested civic action
The problem being tested
Council materials can be lengthy and public participation often arrives late in the process. Public sentiment is difficult to compare consistently with the reasons and votes recorded by elected officials.
Proposed action
Develop a non-binding public overlay using published Council records and agendas. Start with a limited pilot, disclose selection criteria, publish participation limits, and never present beta responses as official assent voting or a scientific poll.
- Submitter disclosure
- Demonstration record prepared for the independent Agora Vancouver beta.
- Category and geography
- Governance · Citywide
- Evidence period
- Aug 14, 2026, 11:45 p.m. PDT to Aug 15, 2026, 11:45 p.m. PDT
- Participation window
- Aug 15, 2026, 11:45 p.m. PDT to Sep 6, 2026, 11:45 p.m. PDT
- Advisory rule
- 60% Yes among Yes + No, plus a 1000-response demonstration quorum
- Participation tier
- Open beta — identity, residence and elector status are not verified
- Eligibility
- Self-selected browser participation; no identity, residence or elector verification
- Small-cell rule
- Withhold every exact result when any nonzero choice group has fewer than 5 responses.
Sources and version origin
- Other: Agora/Civitas Vancouver adaptation
Change summary: Recovered beta proposal recorded as immutable version 1.
Method and authority limitations
- This is an independent public-beta record, not a City service or official institutional record.
- Participation tiers are not combined. This record covers the labelled exact version and tier only.
- Civitas content is a proposed accountable workflow and is official only when the displayed response has separately verified authority.
- Source and analysis records show provenance and review status; they do not by themselves prove truth, completeness or legal authority.