Advisory results record · exact version 1
Should major Council decisions receive a plain-language public advisory vote?
A prototype proposal to pair selected Council agenda items with sourced summaries, trade-offs, advisory voting and a later comparison to the official Council record.
Print-ready page. Use your browser’s Print command to print or save as PDF. Return to the interactive exact-version page.
- Exact proposal version
- 1 (proposal-version:public-council-vote-overlay:1)
- Jurisdiction
- City of Vancouver
- Origin
- Demonstration
- Status
- Open For Participation
Advisory participation result
- Yes
- 0
- No
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
- Yes + No denominator
- 0
- Turnout
- 0
- Demo quorum
- 0/1000 — not met
- Yes threshold
- Not evaluable without a Yes or No response
Participation tier: Open beta — identity, residence and elector status are not verified. Verified-resident and verified-elector records are not included and would be reported separately.
Final aggregate: aggregate-89b38fcf-f5da-49d9-abd2-831db0ce6e1b · advisory-yes-no-abstain-v1 · input commitment e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
Frozen rule: Yes percentage is Yes / (Yes + No); Abstain counts only toward turnout. The displayed threshold is 60% and the demonstration quorum is 1000 responses.
Update rule: the last valid confirmed response for one browser cookie, exact version and tier during the half-open window replaces that browser’s earlier choice.
Method and authority limitations
- This is an independent public-beta record, not a City service or official institutional record.
- Participation tiers are not combined. This record covers the labelled exact version and tier only.
- Civitas content is a proposed accountable workflow and is official only when the displayed response has separately verified authority.
- Source and analysis records show provenance and review status; they do not by themselves prove truth, completeness or legal authority.